On 6/2/17 14:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 5/24/17 15:14, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> All the locking works just fine the way it is in master. The issue with >> deadlock with apply comes from the wrong handling of the SIGTERM in the >> apply (we didn't set InterruptPending). I changed the SIGTERM handler in >> patch 0001 just to die which is actually the correct behavior for apply >> workers. I also moved the connection cleanup code to the >> before_shmem_exit callback (similar to walreceiver) and now that part >> works correctly. > > I have committed this, in two separate parts. This should fix the > originally reported issue. > > I will continue to work through your other patches. I notice there is > still a bit of discussion about another patch, so please let me know if > there is anything else I should be looking for.
I have committed the remaining two patches. I believe this fixes the originally reported issue. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
