Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > Well, it is a nice test template for people who aren't shell script
> > experts, and I have been in the habit of pushing stuff I use into /tools
> > so it is available for others.
> 
> I know and I'm not happy about it.  The PostgreSQL source tree isn't a
> repository of everyone's favorite shell scripts.  There's an official
> method to build and test a PostgreSQL installation.  If that is flawed or
> incomplete, then let's talk about it.  But everyone pushing out their own
> little test methodology without further consideration is not going to help
> this discussion.

I put stuff in /tools so if something happens to me, you guys can keep
going.  Do I have to be clearer that that?  I have RELEASE_CHANGES,
which Tom used for 7.3.X releases, pgindent, stuff for finding
missing/extraneous includes, static requirements, stuff like that.

Unless you can find someone else who agrees with you, it stays.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to