On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:54:27PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> I will send an updated patch once we agree on above points.
>> >>
>> >> Sounds good.
>> >
>> > Attached patch addresses all the comments as discussed.
>>
>> Committed.
>
> Just checking, but you reused some of my code from the 8.3-8.4 migration
> in pg_upgrade that was removed a while back, rather than writing it from
> scratch, right?
>

Yes, I have adapted it to what is required for hash indexes, adjusted
the code for v10 and there are some other minor changes in code.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to