On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.la...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > While browsing through the partitioning code, I noticed that a recent commit > f8bffe9e6d700fd34759a92e47930ce9ba7dcbd5, which fixes multi-column range > partitioning constraints, introduced a function make_partition_op_expr, that > takes keynum as a input parameter to identify the index of the partition > key. > In case of range partition we can have multiple partition keys but for list > partition we have only one. Considering that, I think following code does > not > cause any side-effect logically(and may be a oversight while moving the code > from function get_qual_for_list to this function): > > saopexpr->inputcollid = key->partcollation[0]; > saopexpr->args = list_make2(arg1, arg2); > > But as we have keynum now, should we be using it to index > key->partcollation, > instead of a hard coded '0'.
Agreed. Committed your patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
