On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5/15/17 23:45, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> +1. We should throw an error and add a line in documentation that >> collation should not be specified for hash partitioned table. > > Why is it even allowed in the parser then?
That grammar is common to all the partitioning strategies. It looks like it's easy to handle collation for hash partitions in transformation than in grammar. But, if we could handle it in grammar, I don't have any objection to it. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
