2017-05-11 17:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org>: > Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > It is similar to my first or second proposal - rejected by Tom :( > > Doesn't it differ? ISTM that in the patches/discussion related to: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/11/787/ > it was proposed to change \set in one way or another, > and also in the point #1 of this present thread: > > > > 1. using psql variables - we just need to write commands \setfrom > > > \setfrombf - this should be very simple implementation. The value can > be > > > used more times. On second hand - the loaded variable can hold lot of > > > memory (and it can be invisible for user). > > > My comment is: let's not change \set or even create a variant > of it just for importing verbatim file contents, in text or binary, > because interpolating psql variables differently in the query itself > is all we need. >
My memory is wrong - Tom didn't reject this idea http://www.postgresql-archive.org/proposal-psql-setfileref-td5918727i20.html There was 100% agreement on format and then discussion finished without any result. Regards Pavel > > > Best regards, > -- > Daniel Vérité > PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org > Twitter: @DanielVerite >