Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:36:39AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> Do any of the committers who voted for this change feel inclined to
>> pick this patch up?
> I'll echo that question. This open item lacks a clear owner. One might argue
> that 806091c caused it by doing the backward-compatibility breaks that
> inspired this patch, but that's a link too tenuous to create ownership.
If no one else takes this, I will pick it up --- but I don't anticipate
having any time for it until after Monday's back-branch release wraps.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
