On 05/05/17 18:18, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-05-05 13:53:16 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> On 05/05/17 02:42, Andres Freund wrote: >>> On 2017-05-04 17:00:04 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >>>> Attached is a prototype patch for that. >>> >> >> I am not sure I understand the ABI comment for started_collection_at. >> What's the ABI issue? The struct is private to snapbuild.c module. Or >> you want to store it in the ondisk snapshot as well? > > It's stored on-disk already :(
Hmm okay, well then I guess we'll have to store it somewhere inside running, we should not normally care about that since we only load CONSISTENT snapshots where running don't matter anymore. Alternatively we could bump the SNAPBUILD_VERSION but that would make it impossible to downgrade minor version which is bad (I guess we'll want to do that for master, but not back-branches). -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
