On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:43:34AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > Hello Bruce, > > >I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes. They > >are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current. Please > >give me any feedback you have. > > About: > > """ > Fix psql \p to always print what would be executed by \g or \w (Daniel > Vérité) > > Previously \p didn't properly print the reverted-to command after a > buffer contents reset. CLARIFY? > """ > > The fix is linked to the change introduced by Tom when refactoring/cleaning > up in e984ef586 (\if) which change psql's \p behavior. > > This is not a user visible change version-to-version, it is more like a bug > fix for a bug/behavioral change introduced within pg10 developement process > itself. > > I'm not sure how this should appear in the release notes. Maybe not at all, > associated to the feature in which the behavioral change was introduced...
Agreed, I removed the item and moved those commits to the \if item. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
