On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> 3. Go ahead with converting the postmaster to use WaitEventSet, a la >> the draft patch I posted earlier. I'd be happy to do this if we were >> at the start of a devel cycle, but right now seems a bit late --- not >> to mention that we really need to fix 9.6 as well. > > Yea, backpatching this to 9.6 seems like a bigger hammer than > appropriate. I'm on the fence WRT master, I think there's an argument > to be made that this is going to become a bigger and bigger problem, and > that we'll wish in a year or two that we had fewer releases with > parallelism etc that don't use WaitEventSets.
I think changing this might be wise. This problem isn't going away for real until we do this, right? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
