Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > > On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > >> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*, > > >> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better. > > > > > "stx" perhaps? > > > > > I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta". > > > > "stx" sounds pretty good to me --- it seems like e.g. "stxkind" is > > more visibly distinct from "stakind" than "stekind" would be. > > > > Any objections out there? > > stx sounds good to me too. I'll see about a patch this afternoon.
Took me a bit longer than I had hoped, but it's done now. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
