On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/04/12 0:22, Fujii Masao wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Amit Langote >> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> On 2017/04/07 0:56, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Amit Langote >>>> <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>>>> It seems pg_stat_progress_vacuum is not supposed to appear in the table >>>>> titled "Collected Statistics Views". It was added by c16dc1aca. Attached >>>>> patch fixes that. >>>> >>>> Instead, it should appear in the table of "Dynamic Statistics Views" >>>> because it reports dynamic info, i.e., progress, about VACUUM activity? >>> >>> I thought the same at first, but then realized we have a entirely separate >>> section 28.4. Progress Reporting. >> >> Yes, but I don't think that removing that from 28.2 is an improvement >> for users. > > Perhaps you're right. Here's a patch that moves pg_stat_progress_vacuum > to the Dynamic Statistics Views table.
Thanks for the patch! Pushed. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
