On 4/7/17 2:59 AM, Beena Emerson wrote: > I ran tests and following are the details: > > Machine details: > Architecture: ppc64le > Byte Order: Little Endian > CPU(s): 192 > On-line CPU(s) list: 0-191 > Thread(s) per core: 8 > Core(s) per socket: 1 > Socket(s): 24 > NUMA node(s): 4 > Model: IBM,8286-42A > > clients> 16 32 64 > 128 > size > 16MB 18895.63486 28799.48759 37855.39521 27968.88309 > 32MB 18313.1461 29201.44954 40733.80051 32458.74147 > 64 MB 18055.73141 30875.28687 42713.54447 38009.60542 > 128MB 18234.31424 33208.65419 48604.5593 45498.27689 > 256MB 19524.36498 35740.19032 54686.16898 54060.11168 > 512MB 20351.90719 37426.72174 55045.60719 56194.99349 > 1024MB 19667.67062 35696.19194 53666.60373 54353.0614 > > I did not get any degradation, in fact, higher values showed performance > improvement for higher client count.
This submission has been moved to CF 2017-07. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
