On 2017-04-06 13:43:55 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-04-06 10:00:32 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sure I can do that, In attached patch, I only fixed the problem of not > > > executing the bitmap test. Now, I will add few cases to cover other > > > parts especially rescan and prefetching logic. > > > > I have added two test cases to cover rescan, prefetch and lossy pages > > logic for parallel bitmap. I have removed the existing case because > > these two new cases will be enough to cover that part as well. > > > > Now, nodeBitmapHeapScan.c has 95.5% of line coverage. > > Great! Pushed.
At some point it might also be a good idea to compare parallel and non-parallel results. It's obviously quite possible to break semantics with parallelism... - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
