On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Vinayak Pokale >> <pokale_vinayak...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: >>> make installcheck-world: tested, passed >>> Implements feature: tested, passed >>> Spec compliant: tested, passed >>> Documentation: tested, passed >>> >>> I have tested the latest patch and it looks good to me, >>> so I marked it "Ready for committer". >>> Anyway, it would be great if anyone could also have a look at the patches >>> and send comments. >>> >>> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer >>> >> >> Thank you for updating but I found a bug in 001 patch. Attached latest >> patches. >> The differences are >> * Fixed a bug. >> * Ran pgindent. >> * Separated the patch supporting GetPrepareID API. >> > > Since previous patches conflict with current HEAD, I attached latest > set of patches. >
Vinayak, why did you marked this patch as "Move to next CF"? AFAIU there is not discussion yet. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
