On 04/06/2017 08:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: >> I'm going to push the attached in a few hours unless there is any >> additional discussion. As stated above we'll do the regression changes >> in a separate patch once that is sorted. I used Tom's approach and >> comment wording for 0001a. > > Looks generally sane, but I noticed a grammatical nitpick: > > - * Only attributes within regular relation or partition relations have > + * Only attributes within regular relations or partition relations have
Good call -- thanks! Any thoughts on whether 0001a and 0001b ought to be backpatched? I'm thinking not given the lack of past complaints but it might make sense to do. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
