On 2017-04-05 10:48:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2017-03-31 20:23:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> 0001 has the problem that we have a firm rule against putting any > >> #includes whatsoever before "postgres.h". This stdbool issue has come > >> up before, though, and I fear we're going to need to do something > >> about it. > > > I think in this case it makes sense to deviate from that rule, > > temporarily and locally. > > I'd really rather not. It might be safe here, because this code > only works on Linux anyway, but it's still a dangerous precedent.
Well, what's the alternative for v10? There's already precedent btw., cf plperl.h undefining bool. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
