On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > In any case, the comment right before BackgroundWorkerArray says this: > > * These counters can of course overflow, but it's not important here > * since the subtraction will still give the right number. > > which means that this assert > > + Assert(BackgroundWorkerData->parallel_register_count >= > + BackgroundWorkerData->parallel_terminate_count); > > is outright broken, just like any other attempts to rely on simple > comparisons of these two counters, no?
Yeah, that's busted. Good catch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
