On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Committed.
Thanks Robert,
And also sorry, one unfortunate thing happened in the last patch while
fixing one of the review comments a variable disappeared from the
equation
@_hash_spareindex.
splitpoint_phases +=
- (((num_bucket - 1) >> (HASH_SPLITPOINT_PHASE_BITS + 1)) &
+ (((num_bucket - 1) >>
+ (splitpoint_group - (HASH_SPLITPOINT_PHASE_BITS + 1))) &
HASH_SPLITPOINT_PHASE_MASK); /* to 0-based value. */
I wanted most significant 3 bits. And while fixing comments in patch11
I unknowingly somehow removed splitpoint_group from the equation.
Extremely sorry for the mistake. Thanks to Ashutosh Sharma for
pointing the mistake.
--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
_hash_spareindex_defect.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
