On 04/03/2017 02:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-04-01 16:20:46 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> On 03/31/2017 03:17 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >>> >>> On 30 Mar 2017 23:43, "Dmitry Dolgov" <9erthali...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:9erthali...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On 31 March 2017 at 00:01, Andrew Dunstan >>> <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com >>> <mailto:andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I have just noticed as I was writing/testing the non-existent >>> docs for >>> > this patch that it doesn't supply variants of to_tsvector that >>> take a >>> > regconfig as the first argument. Is there a reason for that? Why >>> > should the json(b) versions be different from the text versions? >>> >>> No, there is no reason, I just missed that. Here is a new version >>> of the patch (only the functions part) >>> to add those variants. >>> >>> >>> Congratulations with patch committed, who will write an addition >>> documentation? I think we need to touch FTS and JSON parts. >> I added documentation when I committed it for the new functions, in the >> FTS section. I'm not sure what we need to add to the JSON section if >> anything. > I see that the CF entry for this hasn't been marked as committed: > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/1054/ > Is there anything left here? >
Says "Status committed" for me. I fixed this in Sunday after Tom prodded me. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
