On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Michael Banck <michael.ba...@credativ.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Is there an argument for back-patching this? > > > > > > Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did. > > > > > > I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take > > your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it? > > I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom > and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you > decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item? No, I plan to work on it, so it's still an open item. I've been backlogged with other things, but I will try to get too it soon. (This also includes considering Jeff's note) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
