On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > I think you can call HandleStartupProcInterrupts() here, instead of checking > postmaster death.
Oops, sorry for that, I quite mess up with this patch. The WaitLatch() call should still have WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH so as it can leave earlier, but yes I agree with your analysis that HandleStartupProcInterrupts() as this is part of the redo work. > Did Simon's committed patch solve the problem as expected? Does not seem so, I'll let Simon comment on this matter... -- Michael
standby-delay-latch-v6.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
