Tom, all, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in > the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches remain > open and what the prospects are for getting them done. (In the past > we've sometimes let the final fest stretch on indefinitely, which is > clearly the Wrong Thing; but that doesn't mean that the Right Thing is > to say that it ends at 2017-04-01 00:00 UTC no matter what.) The RMT > should look at things in another day or two and make a judgment call > about that.
I tend to agree with this, though I am also of the opinion that it'd be better to get a date out there earlier rather than later. There's a number of hackers at PGConf.US who are trying their best to review patches and keep things moving while also giving talks and being involved in the conference. There's at least a couple of patches which I can think of off-hand that I'd like to continue working through the process to get them committed and only require another day or so of effort, but finding that time in-between activities at the conference, while possible, isn't ideal. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
