On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>> I don't see any precedent in the code for having a hardcoded role, other >>> than >>> superuser, and allowing privileges based on a hardcoded test for membership >>> in that role. I'm struggling to think of all the security implications of >>> that. >> >> This would be the first. > > Isn't pg_signal_backend an existing precedent?
Good point. Clearly time for some caffeine. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
