On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: David Steele [mailto:da...@pgmasters.net]
>> Well, that's embarrassing.  When I recreated the function to add defaults
>> I messed up the AS clause and did not pay attention to the results of the
>> regression tests, apparently.
>>
>> Attached is a new version rebased on 88e66d1.  Catalog version bump has
>> also been omitted.
>
> I was late to reply because yesterday was a national holiday in Japan.  I 
> marked this as ready for committer.  The patch applied cleanly and worked as 
> expected.

The patch basically looks good to me, but one comment is;
backup.sgml (at least the description for "Making a non-exclusive
low level backup) seems to need to be updated.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to