if (buf->usage_count < BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)
if (BUF_STATE_GET_USAGECOUNT(buf_state) != BM_MAX_USAGE_COUNT)
being prone to paranoia, I prefer the first, but I've seen both styles in
the code so I don't know if it's worth futzing with.
Ok, let's be paranoic and do this same way as before. Revised patch is
attached.
I see the change was done in 9.6 release cycle in commit
48354581a49c30f5757c203415aa8412d85b0f70 at April, 10. Does it mean the fix
should be backpatched too?
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teo...@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
