David Rowley wrote:
> + k = -1;
> + while ((k = bms_next_member(attnums, k)) >= 0)
> + {
> + bool attr_found = false;
> + for (i = 0; i < info->stakeys->dim1; i++)
> + {
> + if (info->stakeys->values[i] == k)
> + {
> + attr_found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* found attribute not covered by this ndistinct stats, skip */
> + if (!attr_found)
> + {
> + matches = false;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
>
> Would it be better just to stuff info->stakeys->values into a bitmapset and
> check its a subset of attnums? It would mean allocating memory in the loop,
> so maybe you think otherwise, but in that case maybe StatisticExtInfo
> should store the bitmapset?
Yeah, I think StatisticExtInfo should have a bitmapset, not an
int2vector.
> + appendPQExpBuffer(&buf, "(dependencies)");
>
> I think it's better practice to use appendPQExpBufferStr() when there's no
> formatting. It'll perform marginally better, which might not be important
> here, but it sets a better example for people to follow when performance is
> more critical.
FWIW this should have said "(ndistinct)" anyway :-)
> + change the definition of a extended statistics
>
> "a" should be "an", Also is statistics plural here. It's commonly mixed up
> in the patch. I think it needs standardised. I personally think if you're
> speaking of a single pg_statatic_ext row, then it should be singular. Yet,
> I'm aware you're using plural for the CREATE STATISTICS command, to me that
> feels a bit like: CREATE TABLES mytable (); am I somehow thinking wrongly
> somehow here?
This was discussed upthread as I recall. This is what Merriam-Webster says on
the topic:
statistic
1 : a single term or datum in a collection of statistics
2 a : a quantity (as the mean of a sample) that is computed from a sample;
specifically : estimate 3b
b : a random variable that takes on the possible values of a statistic
statistics
1 : a branch of mathematics dealing with the collection, analysis,
interpretation, and presentation of masses of numerical data
2 : a collection of quantitative data
Now, I think there's room to say that a single object created by the new CREATE
STATISTICS is really the latter, not the former. I find it very weird
that a single of these objects is named in the plural form, though, and
it looks odd all over the place. I would rather use the term
"statistics object", and then we can continue using the singular.
> + If a schema name is given (for example, <literal>CREATE STATISTICS
> + myschema.mystat ...</>) then the statistics is created in the specified
> + schema. Otherwise it is created in the current schema. The name of
>
> What's created in the current schema? I thought this was just for naming?
Well, "created in a schema" means that the object is named after that
schema. So both are the same thing. Is this unclear in some way?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
