On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:39 PM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > Agreed. Perhaps both types of syntax should be supported, one that is > friendly to users and one that is precise for dump tools and those who > care get in the weeds.
Eventually, sure. For the first version, I want to skip the friendly syntax and just add the necessary syntax. That makes it easier to make sure that pg_dump and everything are working the way you want. Range and list partitioning could potentially grow convenience syntax around partition creation, too, but that wasn't essential for the first patch, so we cut it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
