Hi Andreas, On 3/1/17 8:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2/3/17 07:12, Andreas Karlsson wrote: >> On 01/25/2017 07:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> What I think you should do is making the code path of >>> \\h smarter with some exceptions by using TailMatchesCS2() for ALTER. >>> There is as well the case of DROP commands that should be treated by >>> the way. >> >> Yes, I think that is correct approach. I have attached a patch where I >> add completion for \h ALTER and \h DROP. > > Instead of creating another copy of list_ALTER, let's use the > words_after_create list and write a version of > create_command_generator/drop_command_generator.
Do you know when you will have a new patch available for review that incorporates Peter's request? Thanks, -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
