On 3/7/17 11:16, Robert Haas wrote: > Well, if the problem you're trying to solve is "retain WAL for as long > as possible without running out of disk space and having everything go > kablooey", then it would solve that problem, and I think that's a very > reasonable problem to want to solve.
Could be. I'm not sure what that means for the presented patch, though. Or whether it addresses Michael's original use case at all. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
