Amit, Michael,

* Amit Langote (langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote:
> On 2017/03/09 11:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Langote
> > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >> On 2017/03/08 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> Only regular tables are tested as valid objects. Testing toast tables
> >>> is not worth the complication. Could you add as well a matview?
> >>
> >> Done in the attached updated patch.
> > 
> > +select count(*) > 0 from pg_visibility('matview');
> > + ?column?
> > +----------
> > + f
> > +(1 row)
> > That's quite a generic name :) You may want to use less common names
> > in your tests.
> 
> I agree.  Updated patch attached.
> 
> > OK, I am marking that as ready for committer.

I'm starting to look over this, seems pretty straight-forward.

Barring issues, I should get it committed in probably an hour or two.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to