Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> writes:
> On 03/01/2017 05:49 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2/27/17 09:51, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> No objection to the basic point, but "log" seems perhaps a little too
>>> generic to me. Would something like "server_log" be better?
>> Well, "log" is pretty well established. There is /var/log, and if you
>> unpack a, say, Kafka or Cassandra distribution, they also come with a
>> log or logs directory.
> +1, though I am also fine with server_log.
FWIW, I'm not strongly advocating for "server_log", I just thought it
was worth having some discussion around the name. Peter's point above
is pretty good though.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
