On 2017/03/05 16:20, Simon Riggs wrote: > I notice also that > \d+ <tablename> > does not show which partitions have subpartitions.
Do you mean showing just whether a partition is itself partitioned or showing its partitions and so on (because those partitions may themselves be partitioned)? Maybe, we could do the former. > I'm worried that these things illustrate something about the catalog > representation that we may need to improve, but I don't have anything > concrete to say on that at present. Perhaps. As Ashutosh said though, it does not seem like a big problem in this particular case. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
