On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest > inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we > compare the paths in that loop. I am not sure if there is any other > better way to handle the same.
Done that way. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
parallel_mergejoin_v8.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
