On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: > On 2/24/17 6:30 AM, Kuntal Ghosh wrote: >> >> * You're considering any WAL file with a power of 2 as valid. Suppose, >> the correct WAL seg size is 64mb. For some reason, the server >> generated a 16mb invalid WAL file(maybe it crashed while creating the >> WAL file). Your code seems to treat this as a valid file which I think >> is incorrect. Do you agree with that? > > > Detecting correct WAL size based on the size of a random WAL file seems like > a really bad idea to me. +1
-- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
