On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:47:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > The IPv6 patch seems to still be a few bricks shy of a load. Grepping > for places that handle AF_INET but not AF_INET6 revealed these > unimplemented features: > > 1. IDENT authorization. Fails if either local or remote address is IPv6.
I've actually written this already. > 2. SSL. Postmaster allows SSL for AF_INET but not AF_INET6. Hmm, it really shouldn't matter if it uses AF_INET or AF_INET6 ... I should look into that. > 3. Client address display in backend's ps display seems to be v4 only. I'll take a look at that too. > 4. pgstat code can only bind to 127.0.0.1 (v4 loopback). On a v6-only > machine this would not exist, would it? I'm not sure, but I think I changed something about that. Can you point me to that code? Kurt ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
