Tom Lane writes: > Andrew Sullivan expressed concern about this, too. The thing could > be made a little more failsafe if we made it impossible to set > ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES to true in postgresql.conf, or by any means other > than an actual SET command --- whose impact would then be limited to > the current session. This is kind of an ugly wart on the GUC mechanism, > but I think not difficult to do with an assign_hook (it just has to > refuse non-interactive settings).
Fighting against people who randomly change settings without being informed about what they do is pointless. It's like trying to prevent 'rm -rf /*'. And it's not like you can easily set anything in postgresql.conf by accident. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster