[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjutas N, 03.04.2003 kell 02:01: > mlw wrote: > > I think you are interpreting the spec a bit too restrictively. The > > syntax is fairly rigid, but the spec has a great degree of flexibility. > > I agree that, syntactically, it must work through a parser, but there is > > lots of room to be flexible. > > This is /exactly/ the standard problem with SOAP. > > There is enough "flexibility" that there are differing approaches > associated, generally speaking, with "IBM versus Microsoft" whereby it's > easy to generate SOAP requests that work fine with one that break with > the other.
Do you know of some: a) standard conformance tests b) recommended best practices for being compatible with all mainstream implementations (I'd guess a good approach would be to generate very strictly conformant code but accept all that you can, even if against pedantic reading of the spec) ----------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
