2017-02-02 16:34 GMT+01:00 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us>: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 07:18:45AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:16:29PM +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I just don't see this patch going in. I think it needs are larger > > > approach to the problems it is trying to solve. I think it then > > > will be very useful. > > > > What problems that it's trying to solve are not addressed? > > Unjoined tables. Inconsistent alias references. I think there are a > bunch of things and if we can make a list and get a mode to warn about > all of them, it would be very useful. >
Identification of unjoined tables should be very useful - but it is far to original proposal - so it can be solved separately. This patch is simple - and usually we prefer more simple patches than one bigger. Better to enhance this feature step by step. Regards Pavel > > -- > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + > + Ancient Roman grave inscription + > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
