On 2017-02-02 09:22:46 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: > > Speaking of which... I have a meeting in 15 minutes to discuss moving to a > > server with 4TB of memory. With current limits shared buffers maxes at 16TB, > > which isn't all that far in the future. While 16TB of shared buffers might > > not be a good idea, it's not going to be terribly long before we start > > getting questions about it. > > Time for int64 GUCs?
I don't think the GUC bit is the hard part. We'd possibly need some trickery (like not storing bufferid in BufferDesc anymore) to avoid increasing memory usage. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
