2017-02-01 6:05 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > There is no code yet. Code review and testing is where things get firmer. > > > > My personal stance right now is that I'd like to see catalog-decared > typed > > variables. I would prefer them to be transactional and would at least > oppose > > anything that didn't allow future room for that capability. I'd prefer > that > > non-transactional vars be clearly declared as such. > > > > In the end though... I'm not the one implementing it. I can have some > > influence through the code review process. But it's whoever steps up > with a > > proposed implementation that has the biggest say. The rest of us can say > yes > > or no to some degree... but nobody can make someone else implement > something > > they don't want. > > The last patch is from the 6th of December and does not apply anymore: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRA9w_AujBAYdLR0UVfXwwoxhmn% > 2BFbNHnD3_NL%3DJ9x3y8w%40mail.gmail.com > I don't have a better idea than marking this patch as "returned with > feedback" for now, as the thread has died 3 weeks ago as well. > There is not a agreement on the form of session variables. Regards Pavel > -- > Michael >
