On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1/26/17 2:05 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I do not think it can be right to rename the directory and not >> anything else. > > I think this is the root of the confusion. > > A lot of people apparently consented to renaming pg_xlog with the > understanding that that's it, whereas other people understood it as > consensus for renaming everything. > > You really have (at least) three options here: > > 1. Rename nothing > 2. Rename directory only > 3. Rename everything > > and you need to count the votes of each pair separately.
4. Rename everything with aliases. I would vote for 4., or 3. for consistency if 4. is not an eligible choice. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
