On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1/24/17 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Craig Ringer <craig.rin...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> Personally I think we should aim to have this in as a non default build >>> mode in pg10 if it can be made ready, and aim to make it default in pg11 at >>> least for Windows. >> >> AFAIK we haven't committed to accepting this at all, let alone trying >> to do so on a tight schedule. And I believe there was general agreement >> that we would not accept it as something to maintain in parallel with >> the existing makefiles. If we have to maintain two build systems, we >> have that already. > > My preferred scenario would be to replace the Windows build system by > this first, then refine it, then get rid of Autoconf. > > The ideal timeline would be to have a ready patch to commit early in a > development cycle, then get rid of the Windows build system by the end > of it. Naturally, this would need buy-in from Windows developers.
This looks like a really good plan to me. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
