Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug McNaught wrote:
>> Maybe clock_time() and statement_time(), with transaction_time() an
>> alias for now() (if that's seemed necessary)?
I could go with that ...
> We already have CURRENT_TIMESTAMP. Would CLOCK_TIMESTAMP,
> TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP, and STATEMENT_TIMESTAMP make sense, with
> CURRENT_TIMESTAMP being the same as TRANSACTION_TIMESTAMP?
... or that. But, please, *not* the weird no-parentheses syntax that
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP has. Make it clock_timestamp() and so on.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
