David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 19 January 2017 at 11:06, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
> > Old patch no longer applies, so I've attached a rebased patch. This
> > also re-adds a comment line which I mistakenly removed.
>
> (meanwhile Andres commits 69f4b9c)
>
> I should've waited a bit longer.
>
> Here's another that fixes the new conflicts.
I suspect that "inner" and "outer" relation / tuple are sometimes confused in
comments:
* analyzejoins.c:70
"searches for subsequent matching outer tuples."
* analyzejoins.c:972
/*
* innerrel_is_unique
* Check for proofs which prove that 'innerrel' can, at most, match a
* single tuple in 'outerrel' based on the join condition in
* 'restrictlist'.
*/
* relation.h:1831
bool inner_unique; /* inner side of join matches no more
than one
* outer side
tuple */
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
