I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of
porting --- there was just no way to port it.
Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.
Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
