> I think we should stick with the existing naming convention. The only > actual problem that's been pointed out here is that an ALTER TABLE > (or COLUMN) RENAME on a serial column doesn't update the sequence name > to match. Seems to me we could fix that with less effort than any of > these solutions would take, and it wouldn't break existing applications.
Non-colliding? Otherwise, it'd be ludicrous to fail a table rename because a sequence with the new name already exists... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
