How can it recurse, actually - there won't be an index with the same name in the subtable?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:21:16AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it > > isn't documented if it is?? I guess it's not really relevant is it? > > Oh, sorry, the command does not recurse. Should it? The whole CLUSTER > thing does not recurse -- in fact that's why I didn't make the ALTER ... > CLUSTER ON version do it, but maybe it should. > > -- > Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) > "El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer) > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
