On 3 January 2017 at 15:50, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Trying to fit recovery targets into one parameter was really not >> feasible, though I tried. > > What was the problem?
There are 5 different parameters that affect the recovery target, 3 of which are optional. That is much more complex than the two compulsory parameters suggested when the proposal was made and in my view tips the balance over the edge into pointlessness. Michael's suggestion for 2 parameters works well for this case. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
