On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 13:41, Barry Lind wrote: > However the proposed FE/BE protocol change to tell the client the > transaction state would allow the driver to detect this. > <snip> > > Of these two limitations the first is more significant since users do > issue 'commit' statements directly sometimes, whereas users would likely > never change the GUC parameter in their SQL. I like the simplicity of > the GUC parameter and that is the reason I converted the jdbc driver in > 7.3 to use this new method. >
While the first may seem more significant, it sounds like it is actually going away with the fe/be protocol changes. If thats true, it seems to me this makes the GUC method the most limiting. Robert Treat ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
